Which statement compares hazards and threats?

The statement that hazards are unintentional while threats often involve malicious action is accurate because it clearly differentiates the nature of hazards and threats in the context of security. Hazards typically refer to situations or conditions that pose a potential risk or danger without human intent, such as natural disasters, equipment failures, or environmental changes. For instance, an earthquake, flood, or breakdown of machinery can create hazards that may lead to adverse outcomes, but these events occur without any deliberate human action.

On the other hand, threats usually stem from human actions that are aimed at causing harm or exploiting weaknesses. This can include criminal activities, cyber attacks, or terrorism, where the intent is to inflict damage or achieve specific objectives at the expense of safety and security. Understanding this distinction is essential for security professionals, as it informs risk assessment and the implementation of strategies to mitigate both hazards and threats effectively. Recognizing that threats commonly involve malicious intent helps prioritize responses and allocate resources for prevention and protection measures against these intentionally harmful actions.